Dream and Reality: The Modern Black Struggle for Freedom and Equality

By Jeannine Swift | Go to book overview

same period.

The picture differs for Black Americans. (See Table 5.) The percentage that family households were of all households declined from 83 to 72 between 1960 and 1985. Over the same period, the percentage of married couples declined from 61 to 37 percent of all family households, and the proportion of female-headed households rose from 19 percent to 31 percent of family households, an increase much greater than the comparable figure for whites.

How do these differences in the distribution of black and white households affect the condition of housing occupied and the risk of homelessness? One cannot say precisely. In general, one would expect family households, especially married couples, to have greater demand for higher quality units than non-family households; income, however, would determine the effectiveness of this demand (i.e., the ability of households to obtain the desired housing). Table 6 reveals that among all races, blacks, and whites, in 1985, married couples had the highest median incomes and therefore the greatest effective demand. Since a smaller proportion of black than of white households is married couples, blacks, collectively, would have less effective demand and therefore, collectively, might live in housing of lesser quality than would households of other racial groups. Thus, since the family composition and income distribution of black households differ from those of either white households or households of all racial groups, one could believe that the median ratios of rent-as-a-percent-of-income and of income-to-value for black households mask greater variance than these same medians for white households or for households of all races. More specifically, the 31 percent of black households headed by females in 1985 with median incomes of about $9,600 could represent a sizable number of households at risk of homelessness if they live in markets in which 30 percent of their incomes, roughly $240 a month, could only acquire substandard housing.( 10) (See Table 6.)


CONCLUSIONS

From the 1960s to the 1980s, although the housing situation of black Americans has improved with respect to condition and segregation, disparities remain. In addition, it may be true that black households are disproportionately disadvantaged by contemporary problems such as homelessness.

The percentages of black households housed comparably to households of all races continue to approach parity but only over gaps as large as decades. For example, although the 22 percent of black renter households in crowded units in 1970 reflects a 20 percentage point decline from this figure in 1940, it was 1950 when 22 percent of renter households of all races had lived in crowded units! It took 20 years for black renter households to "improve" to the level of residential crowdedness experienced by renter households of all races in 1950. Progess is evident, however; by 1980, the percentage of crowded black renter households equaled the percentage of crowded renter households of all races in 1970!

Thus, the dream and the reality continue to diverge, but the extent of the divergence appears to be lessening by some measures.

-98-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Dream and Reality: The Modern Black Struggle for Freedom and Equality
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 162

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.