Consumer Behavior and Energy Policy: An International Perspective

By Eric Monnier; George Gaskell et al. | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Many roadblocks to innovation come from established institutions within local government bureaucracy. Politicians can command cooperation, but these case studies of innovative communities help illustrate why real change in community energy behavior has taken so long. Recruiting new staff or creating new cross-administrative coordinating groups are other tools that can be used to help break down the barriers to change.


THE LIMITS TO INNOVATION

Local innovation naturally has its limits. Communities cannot take the risks a private enterprise can. Community change is therefore seldom revolutionary, as efforts must be considered both legitimate and realistic. Realistic optimism about the possibilities for local action to change energy behavior is based upon the potential released when a community employs its own special resources creatively. Davis took optimal advantage of existing citizens' groups to communicate its energy effort. Nysted exploited a local surplus of straw as a source of fuel, while Uppsala used its district heating statistics to identify energy wasters and mobilize them for energy conservation. Such examples show it is possible to take advantage of local features to solve the energy problems brought on by the oil crisis.

Other communities should not dismiss such special local approaches as irrelevant quirks inapplicable to their own situations, however. The most transferable lessons are just that. Local variation can provide the inspiration for seeing energy as a community problem requiring a community solution. Building on local motivations and resources is one way to make the necessary change to a different community approach to energy a little easier.


NOTES
1.
Among the exceptions is J. Ridgeway, 1979. Most studies are of several communities within a single country, such as Klingberg and Lindahl ( 1982) or Leyral and Monnier ( 1984). A truly comparative effort is Gaskell and Joerges (in press). Lindberg ( 1977) represents a rare example comparing national energy policies from a comparative perspective.
2.
Complete presentations of all case studies and references will be found in Woodward (forthcoming).

-95-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Consumer Behavior and Energy Policy: An International Perspective
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 350

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?