The 1860 campaign was a particularly exciting one, since the slavery debate raged, and war was near. Also, Stephen Douglas made extraordinary efforts to win the campaign, even though his chances were sum.
Although one could conceivably study any of a number of major metropol- itan dailies from the mid-nineteenth century, these three papers are especially good candidates for analysis. The Tribune and Sun-Times are strong, competing papers with different political ideologies, while the New York Times has long been a national opinion leader among the press. For each newspaper, 15 sample days were randomly selected between July 1 and election day. The Sun-Times has not been a continuously published periodical: For elections beginning with 1856, I studied the Chicago Times, for 1896, 1 used the Chicago Times-Herald, and in 1936 I evaluated the Chicago Daily Times. For 1860, certain editions of the Chicago Times could not be located, so those in the Illinois State Historical Library were included in the sample. Only a few issues of the 1856 Tribune were located, and 1856 issues of the Chicago Times were missing.
There are limitations associated with the "data" collected in any oral his- torical study, since informants are asked to remember events and activities which occurred long ago. Although one can find a variety of sophisticated discussions of these problems in history journals -- particularly the Journal of American History and the Oral History Review -- see Herbst ( 1993; pp. 94-5) for my perspec- tive on memory problems in this study.
Perhaps the most vivid and entertaining portrait of socialization and cam- eraderie among campaign journalists can be found in Crouse ( 1974), who describes press activity during the 1972 presidential campaign.
For a broad discussion of varying conceptualizations of public opinion in history, and some documentation of alternative routes for public opinion expres- sion, see Herbst ( 1994).
-33-
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication Information: Book Title: Presidential Polls and the News Media. Contributors: Paul J. Lavrakas - editor, Michael W. Traugott - editor, Peter V. Miller - editor. Publisher: Westview Press. Place of Publication: Boulder, CO. Publication Year: 1995. Page Number: 33.
Add a Shared Note
Shared Notes are comments made by Questia users on books,
book pages, or articles that inform other users and enhance
the Questia research community.
This feature allows you to create and manage separate folders for your different research projects. To view markups for a different project, make that project your current project.
This feature allows you to save a link to the publication you are reading or view all the publications you have put on your bookshelf.
This feature allows you to save a link to the page you are reading, which you can later return to from Projects.
This feature allows you to highlight words or phrases on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to save a note you write on the publication page you are reading.
This feature allows you to create a citation to the page you are reading that you can paste into your paper. Highlight a passage to include that passage as a quotation.
This feature allows you to save a reference to a publication you are reading for your bibliography or generate a bibliography you can paste into your paper.
This feature allows you to print the page you are reading,
including your notes or highlights (IE users must have "print background colors and image" setting selected.)
This feature allows you to look up words in encyclopedia.
Questia's powerful research tools allow you to highlight, take notes, bookmark and even create instant citations and bibliographies. To use these features and save hours of work, you must create a Questia account.
Need a Questia account? Sign up for a FREE trial now. Save time, stress and hassle, and get better grades with trusted, online research.