The New Hampshire Primary and the American Electoral Process

By Niall A. Palmer | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Conclusion: NASS and Beyond

On May 10 and 11, 1996, a special Committee on Presidential Primaries and Caucuses assembled at Washington's Mayflower Hotel. Established by the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS), the committee comprised twelve secretaries from states including Delaware, Pennsylvania, California, Massachusetts, Iowa and Minnesota. Assistant secretaries represented the states of Arizona, Maine and Mississippi. The conference was chaired by New Hampshire's secretary of state, William Gardner. For two days, the committee heard representations from its members as well as a variety of party officials, academic observers, journalists and political activists, including Don Fowler, co-chairman of the Democratic National Committee, former presidential contender Lamar Alexander, GOP strategist and former Reagan adviser Lyn Nofziger, Rhodes Cook, senior political writer for Congressional Quarterly, and Curtis Gans, veteran of the 1968 McCarthy campaign and now director of the Committee for the Study of the American Electorate. 1

The meeting's official purpose was to "receive input and undertake deliberations regarding perceived impacts of 'front-loading' of presidential primaries . . . which emerged in the 1996 presidential primary season."2 The final report, drafted by Arizona's assistant secretary of state Anne Lynch, began by presenting a number of key facts which, it suggested, had created an urgent need for concerted remedial action by state governments and national political parties. Prime among these facts were the chaotic state of primary scheduling, a prospect that was now extending to the 2000 election cycle, and the ongoing efforts by Congress and the Democratic and Republican parties to overhaul the entire presidential nomination system. Furthermore, as Lynch succinctly observed, the candidates themselves "did not like the 1996 process."

The sheer breadth and complexity of the issues under discussion caused initial disagreements concerning the committee's remit. The original intention to debate proposals for reform of a nomination system that all parties agreed was not

-175-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
The New Hampshire Primary and the American Electoral Process
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 198

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?