China's Energy Strategy: Economic Structure, Technological Choices, and Energy Consumption

By Xiannuan Lin | Go to book overview
Save to active project

American and European steel industries. A good example was the agreement between Capital Iron and Steel and the Belgian giant Cockerill. Cockerill constructed a new wire-rod mill with a capacity of 1.2 million tonnes per year for its Walfield complex just before the world steel industry went into deep recession in the late 1970s and decided to shut it down in the early 1980s, as a part of restructuring program. Capital Iron and Steel purchased the mill, along with 2.5 million tonnes per year of upstream steelmaking capacity, at a price of $28 million, which was about one-seventh of the construction costs Cockerill incurred. Overall, China was relatively successful in relocating foreign equipment and facilities. It took the Anshan complex, for example, less than twenty months to dismantle, transport, assemble, and recommission a 0.5 million tonne per year second-hand mill, which started operation in 1987, from the Fairless Works of U.S. Steel.

Technical renovation projects, combined with improved technologies embodied in new production facilities from basic construction projects, raised the technological level of China's iron and steel industry significantly. Several indicators in table 6.12 illustrate the pace of technological progress during 1981- 1987. In ironmaking, the utilization coefficient of blast furnaces increased by 21.8 percent, from 1.47 to 1.79 tonne/, and labor productivity rose by 34.3 percent. In steelmaking, the output share of outdated OHFs and side-blown converters declined by 8.7 percent and 5.1 percent, respectively. In steel finishing, the continuous-casting ratio increased from 7.1 percent to 12.9 percent. This technological progress was a major contributor to improved energy efficiency in China's iron and steel industry between 1981 and 1987.


China's iron and steel industry increased its energy efficiency significantly in the 1980s. Between 1981 and 1987, the industry reduced energy consumption per tonne of crude steel by an average annual rate of about 3 percent, saving more than 2 million tsce of energy a year. The energy savings came from three main sources: (1) a reduction in the iron-to-steel ratio, (2) improved energy management, and (3) technological progress. Quantifying the exact amount of savings from each source is difficult because they were overlapping activities and occurred simultaneously. For example, one way to reduce the iron-to-steel ratio is to change the production process from OHF to EAF. Introduction of new equipment and processes is often accompanied by changes in operations as well. Some energy-efficient measures, such as better control of the air-fuel ratio in reheating furnaces, may require installation of additional equipment (e.g., a computer).


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
China's Energy Strategy: Economic Structure, Technological Choices, and Energy Consumption


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 208

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?