Hearsay and Confrontation in Criminal Trials

By Andrew L.-T. Choo | Go to book overview
Save to active project

CONCLUSION

If there is one general theme that emerges from the diverse issues examined in this Chapter, it is that the strict application of the hearsay rule is, potentially, much more far-reaching than is commonly realized. In order, however, to reach particular results considered to be desirable, courts have resorted on occasion to what one commentator terms 'hearsay-fiddles'.138 These involve, inter alia, the deliberate turning of a blind judicial eye to hearsay issues where considerations of necessity and convenience suggest that a piece of cogent, but technically hearsay, evidence should be left to the jury. 'Hearsay-fiddles' have been resorted to, for example, in cases involving evidence of the identification of persons. Decisions such as McLean demonstrate, however, that in analogous cases not involving the identification of persons, the hearsay rule has been applied with full vigour.

Mechanisms such as the 'unsafe and unsatisfactory' test may also be utilized to ameliorate the harshness of a strict application of the hearsay rule. We have seen that the exclusion of evidence of a third-party confession may in certain circumstances be held to render a conviction unsafe and unsatisfactory. However, here again, an inconsistency arises from the fact that the use of the 'unsafe and unsatisfactory' mechanism has apparently been confined to evidence of third-party confessions, and has not been extended more generally to exculpatory hearsay evidence sought to be adduced by the defence.

Even if they were employed more generally and consistently, devices such as 'hearsay-fiddles' and the 'unsafe and unsatisfactory' mechanism do not represent a satisfactory solution. The use of 'hearsay-fiddles', for example, gives the law an air of hypocrisy, while the device of declaring a conviction unsafe and unsatisfactory at the appeal stage is inadequate compensation for the failure of the law to develop proper principles for application at the trial stage. What is clearly preferable is an approach which requires trial judges to determine admissibility by reference to whether the four 'hearsay dangers' are, in the context of the particular case, sufficiently low to render the evidence reliable enough for the jury's consideration. This idea will be developed at greater length in the succeeding Chapters.

____________________
138
D. J. Birch, "'Hearsay-Logic and Hearsay-Fiddles: Blastland Revisited'", in P. Smith (ed.), Criminal Law: Essays in Honour of J. C. Smith ( 1987).

-73-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Hearsay and Confrontation in Criminal Trials
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 244

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?