Criminal Justice in Europe: A Comparative Study

By Phil Fennell; Christopher Harding et al. | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Discretion and Accountability in Prosecution: A Comparative Perspective on Keeping Crime out of Court



The argument that offenders should only be brought before criminal courts as a last resort, and that diversion from prosecution is often a preferable response to crime, has only recently gained widespread official acceptance within the British criminal justice systems. Such views are of rather longer standing in Holland and this is reflected in the greater variety of diversionary mechanisms available there and the larger numbers of known offenders kept out of court. On the surface this might be seen as a straightforward reflection of the much-vaunted liberalism of the Dutch system, its greater concern about the negative effects of stigmatization, and greater scepticism about the deterrent effect of the public court appearance. While there is certainly something to this argument, any convincing explanation of the differences in diversionary practices must be rooted in more concrete analysis of contrasts in the institutions and legal culture underpinning respective criminal justice practices.

In the United Kingdom, the development of diversion has rested largely on encouraging the increased use of the traditional police caution, while the majority of criminal cases are processed through the courts. In Holland, in contrast, the majority of cases are not decided by the courts. There is extensive use of conditional diversion by the Public Prosecution Service and, in some cases, the police provides a state response to crime that is low-key and largely invisible. Conditional diversion involves the use of techniques whereby the decision not to prosecute is made conditional upon undertakings by the offender. The introduction of such techniques in England and Wales has until recently been rejected by the British Government. Comparative analysis offers an opportunity to examine the ways in which different attitudes to conditional diversion reflect very different institutional backgrounds and legal cultures. In particular, we shall highlight the important differences in both the formal role assigned to prosecutors and the very different cultural assumptions about how they approach that role.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Criminal Justice in Europe: A Comparative Study
Table of contents

Table of contents



Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 406

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?