Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Humane Economy: Populism, Capitalism, and Democracy

By: Norman Pollack | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 111
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

FIVE
The Framework of Democratic Power

The ideological conflict between Populism and the contemporary system of capitalism raised the question of alternative principles of government in a democratic society and, implicitly, the practical meaning of democracy itself. This conflict was dignified by being ideological rather than merely political. It did not merely accentuate temporary political differences over specific policies, despite its occurrence within the limits of a capitalist framework and spectrum of beliefs. The two sides presented incompatible forms of social organization on which to base the rights and well-being of the individual. Each side actively sought (and, in the case of contemporary capitalism, had successfully established) moral supremacy in defining the economic and political foundations of the polity. The roots of this ideological conflict lay in the respective interpretations to be placed on the ideal construct of America; but clearly the fundamental cause of difference lay in the workings of the existing political economy and the attempts to maintain or alter the basic arrangements of capitalism.

The idea of ideological conflict requires closer attention. Populism was essentially a political, rather than an ideological, movement, an admittedly difficult distinction to draw in any organized expression of protest when a conscious emphasis on principles has become the source of action. But Populism's principles were primarily designed to have political application; they were broadly construed as having relevance to relations of power, the responsibilities of government, and individual liberties. Moreover, this very focus tended to minimize matters traditionally taken up by ideology: replacing the political economy as such; questioning the legitimacy of the whole existing social order, not only its supposedly aberrant manifestations; using class organization as the agency of social change or, in the context of conservatism, social restoration; and advocating the direct seizure of power,

-111-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 218
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?