Strategic Doctrine and the Status of Forces
Continued evolution, in the years 1957-1962, in Moscow's view of the strategic situation and its implications for Soviet policy had the effect of furthering some of the developments in the Soviet approach to arms control noted in 1954-1956. But there were constants as well that may go far toward explaining the persistency of some features of Soviet arms control policy.
In the 1957-1962 period Moscow seemed neither to have feared a surprise attack from the West nor to have planned one itself, despite comments from both sides about pre-emption. The Soviet leadership evidently continued to calculate that an atmosphere of détente would help to lower the danger of a nuclear strike from the West. Since general war was not a prominent short-term expectation, medium-range planning could emphasize the political effects of the Soviet military posture rather than actual fighting capacity. Prototype rather than mass-produced weapons systems might to some extent be relied on, and a minimum deterrent could suffice.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Khrushchev and the Arms Race:Soviet Interests in Arms Control and Disarmament, 1954-1964. Contributors: Lincoln P. Bloomfield - Author, Walter C. Clemens Jr. - Author, Franklyn Griffiths - Author. Publisher: M.I.T. Press. Place of publication: Cambridge, MA. Publication year: 1966. Page number: 90.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.