The Race Factor
In the mid 1960's the Legal Defense Fund was ill-prepared to mount a systematic challenge to the procedures employed by the states to impose the death penalty. Its New York staff was still small, spread dangerously thin, and plagued by almost daily civil rights movement crises that required immediate action. What little lawyers' time was available for capital punishment was spent devising, but not implementing, a national abolition strategy or exploring means to prove that capital sentencing for rape was racially discriminatory. For a civil rights organization like the Fund, elimination of racial discrimination was the first priority. The problem that confronted the lawyers here was not changing the law, but assembling the facts so that existing law could be applied and enforced.
One of the purposes behind the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee, adopted in 1868, that the states not "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," nor deny "the equal protection of the laws" was to ensure that all Americans would be subject to like criminal punishment regardless of race or color. While historians have long debated what Reconstruction Congresses thought about matters such as school segregation, the history of the Fourteenth Amendment shows with relative clarity a desire
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Cruel and Unusual:The Supreme Court and Capital Punishment. Contributors: Michael Meltsner - Author. Publisher: Random House. Place of publication: New York. Publication year: 1973. Page number: 73.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.