Croatian Catholics, and Bosnian Muslims should be encouraged to hold regular
discussions over the next several years. As repositories of national identity, the
attitude of these institutions and of their leaders toward reconciliation will be
crucial for its success.
With regard to economic assistance, efforts must be taken to discourage the
concentration of investment funds only in certain areas. Otherwise, there is the
possibility of creating centripetal economic relations and reviving old divisions
within the Balkans, thus perpetuating regional noncooperation and instability.
The point of departure for an effective Western and international policy in
the Balkans should be the stabilization of bilateral and multilateral contacts in
the region, primarily through the continuation and institutionalization of the
process of Balkan cooperation. Also, an effective policy of cooperation will
emphasize the links between the Balkan states and the member states of the EU.
Purposeful diplomacy, conviction, and effort will be needed if these goals are to
be realized. Romanians believe that, instead of a "clash of civilizations," false
opposition between Catholicism and Orthodoxy, increasing fear regarding the
incompatibility of Christianity and Islam, and unrestricted East-West rivalry, a
close, constructive cooperation is not only possible but necessary for the
constitution of the new Europe, within which the Balkans could become a region
of stability, prosperity and progress.
Aside from press monitoring and the author's own conclusions, interpretation of Romania's perception of the impact of the crisis and its possible resolution are based on
informal conversations which the author has held on a regular basis, since 1992, with Foreign Minister Teodor Melescanu, Chief of the General Staff Dumitriu Cioflina, Deputy Defense Minister loan Mircea Pascu, and Director of Romania Foreign
Intelligence loan Talpes.
Tv Euronews, October 14, 1995.
In an April 5, 1994 meeting with Slobodan Milosevic, Romanian President Ion
Iliescu characterized Serbia (and Yugoslavia) as "the very best neighbors of Romania."
Milosevic and the Yugoslav Ambassador to Bucharest have affirmed the same. See for
example, Adevarul, September 9, 1994, and Vocea României, November 28, 1995.
See Iliescu's statement to the press during a visit of Yugoslav President Dobrica
Cosic in Bucharest, Tanjug, February 25, 1993.
See The Observer, September 16, 1994; Deutsche Welle, November 28, 1995;
and Adevarul Economic, December 1995.
For this reason, US intervention and leadership, which had been manifestly
lacking in the first five years, was welcomed by Romania. See Presidential Press
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Book title: Crises in the Balkans:Views from the Participants.
Contributors: Constantine P. Danopoulos - Editor, Kostas G. Messas - Editor.
Publisher: Westview Press.
Place of publication: Boulder, CO.
Publication year: 1997.
Page number: 237.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may
not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.