Leaving the Cave: Evolutionary Naturalism in Social-Scientific Thought

By Pat Duffy Hutcheon | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Preface

T his book was prompted by a question that just would not go away. How can one explain the general failure of social science to accumulate reliable knowledge? It has been around, in its present modern form, for over three centuries, and its seeds have been germinating for much longer. Why, then, the dearth of progress in all but a few isolated areas of scholarship? Why are practitioners in the social realm (such as therapists, politicians, educators and criminologists) still being forced to operate virtually on a "wing and a prayer" while the public continues to suffer the consequences of failed trial- and-error interventions?

As a sociologist of historical, theoretical and interdisciplinary bent, I had become dissatisfied with the excuses of the increasingly beleaguered scientists within these disciplines, and with the popular celebrations of irrationality favoured by the anti-scientists among us. In the end, it was in the justifications of the latter group that I discerned a glimmer of the possible answer.

I began to conjecture that there must be some formidable obstacle to the scientific study of humanity in our culture -- if not in human nature, as the non-rationalists believe and even seem to hope. It came to me that the dominant current of thought in every society, in every historical era, has been fundamentally opposed to the very idea of the operation of cause and effect in human behaviour. This led me to ponder on the nature of the world view that would encourage social science to flourish, and to marvel that elements of it had continued to survive at all, in an environment so consistently hostile.

For I saw at once that the way of thinking conducive to the development of a scientific approach to human studies has been with us for a long time, although its influence is muted even now, in this so-called age of science. It is a way of thinking usually referred to as naturalism, and it has been associated throughout history with the companion idea of evolution. It stems from the premise that human beings are continuous with all of nature, and that all of nature is continuously evolving. I recognized, as well, what I had already sensed but not fully understood about this minority stream of thought. It has always posed a threat to the established philosophy in every time and place in history. It could not do otherwise, for its two necessary premises about existence, and of the place of humankind within it, are in direct conflict with prevailing beliefs about human nature.

-vii-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Leaving the Cave: Evolutionary Naturalism in Social-Scientific Thought
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 504

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?