Public Lands Politics: Interest Group Influence on the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management

By Paul J. Culhane | Go to book overview
Save to active project

11
Conformity, Capture, Multiple Clientelism, and Multiple Use

Public lands policy has traditionally been enmeshed in fundamental political process issues. From Gifford Pinchot and John Muir down to today's environmentalists, the most visible critics of public lands policies have complained that the federal lands are monopolized by consumptive user special interests. A second line of political process criticism has focused on the relative absence of efficiency and expertise in public lands management; as with today's anti-special interests critics, modern efficiency-expertise critics are the philosophical descendents of such early critics of public lands management as Pinchot and John Wesley Powell.

These two lines of political process criticism form the basis of the capture-conformity debate, the most important evaluative issue in public lands administration. The tone and substance of the capture-conformity debate were set largely in 1960, the year in which the major studies of the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) were published. Public lands politics has changed in several significant ways since 1960, but the tone of the debate has not. Before examining how public lands politics has changed, and the implications of those changes for evaluations of the public lands agencies, it is necessary to review the capture-conformity debate to show its relevance to the agencies' own historic aspirations and administrative evaluative criteria generally. While substantive debates about timber, grazing, preservation, and similar pol

-321-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Public Lands Politics: Interest Group Influence on the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 400

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?