children. Perhaps, parents may even conceive of invasions as necessary in being "good" parents. From this view, the kinds of reactions discussed in this chapter may perplex these parents. This type of speculation is beyond the current chapter, but to form a more complete picture of family privacy binds, it seems important to compare the parents' perspective with the college-age children's point of view.
Regardless of the parents' orientation to privacy violations of their children, the point remains that from these data, college-age children believe that invasions comprise the parent-child relationship in meaningful ways. As Youniss and Smollar ( 1985) point out, "individuality, which is probably a primary issue between parents and adolescents, develops gradually through a series of accommodations. . . . The parents retain authority by giving more freedom to adolescents by recognizing their personal needs and capabilities" (pp. 158, 162).
Altman I. ( 1975). "Environmental and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding". Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
Altman I., Vinsel A., & Brown B. ( 1981). "Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation". In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in ex perimental social psychology(Vol. 14, pp. 108-160). New York: Academic Press
Baxter L., & Wilmot W. ( 1984). "Secret tests: Strategies for acquiring information about the state of the relationship". Human Communication Research, 5, 264-272
Berardo F. M. ( 1974). "Family invisibility and family privacy". In S. Margulis (Ed.), Privacy (pp. 55-72). Stony Brook, NY: Environmental Design Research Association
Burgoon J., Parrot R., Le B. Poire, Kelley D., Walther J., & Perry D. ( 1989). "Maintaining and restoring privacy through communication in different types of relationships". Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 131-158
Callan V., & Noller P. ( 1986). "Perceptions of communicative relationships in families with adolescents". Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 813-820
Campbell E., Adams G., & Dobson W. ( 1984). "Familial correlates of identity formation in late adolescence: A study of the predictive utility of connectedness and individuality in family relations". Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 13, 509-525
Chelune G. ( 1979). Self-disclosure. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass
Coleman J., & Hendry L. ( 1990). The nature of adolescence. London: Routledge
Derlega V., & Chaikin A. ( 1977). "Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships". Journal of Social Issues, 33, 102-115
Doster J., & Strickland B. ( 1969). "Perceived childrearing practices and self-disclosure patterns". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 382
Gilbert S., & Whiteneck G. ( 1976). "Toward a multidimensional approach to the study of selfdisclosure". Human Communication Research, 3, 347-355
Grotevant H., & Cooper C. ( 1986). "Individuation in family relationships: A perspective on individual differences in development of identity and role-taking skill in adolescence". Human Development, 29, 82-100
Hendrick S. ( 1987). "Counseling and self-disclosure". In V. Derlega & J. Berg (Eds.), Self-disclosure: Theory, research and therapy (pp. 303-324). New York: Plenum.
-256-
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Book title: The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication.
Contributors: William R. Cupach - Editor, Brian H. Spitzberg - Editor.
Publisher: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Place of publication: Hillsdale, NJ.
Publication year: 1994.
Page number: 256.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset