Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Church and Synagogue Affiliation: Theory, Research, and Practice

By: Amy L. Sales; Gary A. Tobin | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 54
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

On the other hand, the multitude of definitions presents a challenge to research and practice. If concepts are defined and measured in different ways in various research efforts, results cannot be compared across studies, and perhaps not even over time. There is, as well, little common language within and among denominations for addressing policy and planning issues related to increasing congregational affiliation.

Exchange among all the actors--clergy, researchers, national organizations, congregations, denominations, and institutions, including seminaries and universities--is essential. Ultimately, there is agreement that increased participation in religious community is beneficial. Research on factors associated with membership, local recruitment efforts and programs to increase involvement, and national efforts to address major contextual influences on religious life all play key roles in our understanding of participation, growth, and decline. The study of affiliation, membership, and participation must be integrated into the everyday lives of denominations and congregations. Otherwise, isolated individuals, institutions, and movements talking only among themselves (and sometimes not even among themselves) limit the ability of religious groups to increase church and synagogue participation. The first step for a full and productive exchange is to develop a glossary of commonly accepted definitions or, at the very least, to clarify the plurality of meanings underlying the terms being used in our dialogues on congregational affiliation.


REFERENCES

Bahr H. M., & Albrecht S. ( 1989). "Strangers Once More: Patterns of Disaffiliation from Mormonism". journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28( 2), 180-200.

Gallup Poll Organization (American Institute of Public Opinion). ( 1978). The Unchurched American. Princeton: Author.

Hadaway C. K., & Roof W. C. ( 1988). Apostasy in American Churches: Evidence from National Survey Data. In D. G. Bromley (Ed.), Falling from the Faith: Causes and Consequences of Religious Apostasy (pp. 29-46). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Roozen D. A. ( 1978). The Churched and the Unchurched: A Comparative Profile. Washington, D.C.: Glenmary Research Center.

Roozen D. A. ( 1980). "Church Dropouts: Changing Patterns of Disengagement and Reentry". Review of Religious Research, 21, 427-450.

Taylor R. J. ( 1988). "Structural Determinants of Religious Participation among Black Americans". Review of Religious Research, 30, 114-125.

Tobin G. A., Milder L. K.E., Sternberg L., & Seltzer S. ( 1989). Synagogue Affiliation among Reform Jews. Brookline, MA: Union of American Hebrew Congregations, Committee on the Jewish Family.

Turner G. B. ( 1984). On the Outside Looking In: The Story of the Church Dropout and What the Church Can Do about It. In G. E. Morris (Ed.), Rethinking Congregational Development (pp. 65-80). Lake Junaluska, NC: The World Methodist Council.

-54-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 198
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?