the present design.
The income maintenance system has evolved slowly and painfully over time. Group by group, the problem of poverty in the United States has been addressed piecemeal. Old people were taken care of by social security. Veterans have benefits. Single mothers qualify for AFDC. The disabled are paid SSI. The unemployed, if they were previously employed, draw unemployment insurance. Incapacitated workers can get workers' compensation. Students are awarded grants and loans. But if one does not belong to a recognized group, there are only two institutions to turn to: the military, and the prisons. Far too many end up in the criminal justice system, which is a very expensive alternative to rational and comprehensive income maintenance.
With a seven trillion dollar economy, it seems time to rethink our entire approach to the general subject of income maintenance, not just welfare. As Thomas Jefferson advised us:
I am not an advocate for frequent changes in laws and constitutions. But laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors. 665
The circumstances have changed from the times when govenments took children away from their widowed mothers, forbade poor people from traveling, and compelled mothers to work rather than to rear their children. It is not possible to live off the land, to escape to the frontier, to homestead a farm. The very simple truth is that it takes money to live in a modern, post-industial, urban society. As a society, we must find a rational system to allocate support. We presently have a vast number of programs to accomplish this end. It is possible to consolidate them into a single system that is simple, fair, efficient, and comprehensive. I am not recommending that we do much more, only that we do much better.