Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Government Structures in the U.S.A. and the Sovereign States of the Former U.S.S.R: Power Allocation among Central, Regional, and Local Governments

By: James E. Hickey Jr.; Alexej Ugrinsky | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 203
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

18
Decentralization Costs and Benefits: Designing a Federal State

Philip J. Grossman and Priya Rajagopalan

Over the past few months, the Soviet Union has begun the transformation from a highly centralized state to a highly decentralized state. Complete dissolution of the union is a distinct possibility. Many of the 15 republics making up the Soviet Union have declared their independence from the central government. 1 These declarations have, however, been tempered by the recognition that complete independence is not immediately feasible. It is recognized by even the most independently minded republics that economic ties will continue to bind the republics to the Union, at least for the short run.

Given that the Soviet Union will continue to exist as both a political and an economic entity for the foreseeable future, this reformulation of the Soviet federation will require a new power-sharing agreement between the republics and the central government. Clearly, this will involve decentralization of control over taxing and spending powers. This need not, and should not, imply complete emasculation of the central government. The question that must be answered is, which fiscal prerogatives should remain with the central government and which should devolve to the republics?

To shed some light on this issue, this paper considers the costs and benefits of decentralization of government taxing and spending powers. The prescriptions of the conventional theory of federalism are contrasted with those of the "Leviathan" models of government. The paper also reviews the empirical evidence from tests of the Leviathan theory.


ADVANTAGES OF A FEDERAL STATE

Economists have long recognized the economic advantages of a federal system of government (see, for example, Tiebout 1956). Tiebout considers a

-203-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 474
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?