Law and Regulation of Common Carriers in the Communications Industry

By Daniel L. Brenner | Go to book overview
Save to active project



Robert W. Crandall

It has become the conventional wisdom that technological forces are propelling all communications media towards a single, ubiquitous digital network that can be called an "information superhighway." Many assume that the myriad of companies in the local telephone, long-distance telephone, and cable television industries is about to coalesce into one large, interactive terrestrial network with a variety of interconnected wireless adjuncts. While this view may ultimately prove to have some merit, it is also possible that the fragmentation of the past 15 or 20 years will actually accelerate. In fact, I doubt that anyone can predict the evolution of telecommunications in the next 10 or 20 years any more than he or she could have predicted in 1974 that the AT&T dynasty would end in 1984, that a pair of copper wires could deliver a television signal, or that everyone would be able to carry a portable telephone handset weighing only a few ounces and costing less than $200. Communications technology is changing so rapidly and is opening up so many new potential applications for which we have little or no information on consumer demand that all forecasts must be taken as something between speculation and an informed guess.

In this article, my task is more modest than that of predicting convergence, divergence, or even chaos. It is to identify the economic forces that are driving the market and the rhetoric toward convergence even though the political forces may, as in the past, prevent these economic forces from dictating the structure of this very important sector.

The current structure of the telecommunications sector in the United States and, indeed, in most countries, reflects a series of governmental actions and historical accidents. The telephone industry remained a monopoly far longer than technology and demand conditions required. Broadcasting was cartelized by a series of regulatory decisions, beginning with the allocation of the electromagnetic spectrum in the 1950s. Cable television was delayed for decades to protect broadcasters. International satellite communications were monopolized for no

( 1995) Annual Review of Institute for Annual Information Studies. Reprinted by permission.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Law and Regulation of Common Carriers in the Communications Industry


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 360

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?