Critical Issues in American Art: A Book of Readings

By Mary Ann Calo | Go to book overview
Save to active project

alternate courting and whipping each other. Boxing, as exposed and powerfully accentuated as it is in Stag at Sharkey's, is male to male masochistic foreplay, craved and detested, on public display.

The force of Stag at Sharkey's lies not only in the artist's rigorous and remarkable manipulation of paint and his magnification of boxing's eroticism and brutality, but also in Bellows's treatment of an athletic event that struggled to maintain itself despite its illegal status. The desire for fighting events, which served a ritual function, was greater than the strength of the law. In the early part of the twentieth century, boxing provided many men with a forum for understanding and reinforcing a conception of masculinity that was constructed out of conflicting methods and desires: individual authority and control were gained by resisting public authority, sensuality and intimacy were intertwined with violence, and physical perfection and admiration were countered by destruction.


NOTES

Revised by the author from Smithsonian Studies in American Art (Spring 1988). Reprinted by permission of the author and the National Museum of American Art.

A version of this essay was first presented at the Tenth Annual Whitney Symposium on American Art in April 1987. For their comments on the original essay, I wish to thank Diane Kirkpatrick, Janice Simon, Richard Rand, and Thomas Crow. The essay is reprinted here with only slight modification.

For background information on George Bellows, see: Charles H. Morgan, George Bellows: Painter of America ( New York: Reynal & Co., 1965); Donald Braider , George Bellows and the Ashcan School of Painting ( New York: Doubleday & Co., 1971); E. A. Carmean , John Wilmerding, Linda Ayers, and Deborah Chotner , Bellows: The Boxing Pictures ( Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art, 1982); and Lauris Mason , The Lithographs of George Bellows ( New York: KTO Press, 1977).

Since the publication of this essay on masculinity and boxing at the turn of the century, numerous studies on the topic have appeared; particularly relevant books include: Gail Bederman, Manliness and Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880-1917 ( Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995) and Michael Kimmel, Manhood in America: A Cultural History ( New York: The Free Press, 1996). For the most recent book on George Bellows's art see Marianne Doezema, George Bellows and Urban America ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992). Of the numerous studies on Thomas Eakins, a notable essay related to my analysis of Eakins's photographs is by Whitney Davis, "Erotic Revision in Thomas Eakins's Narratives of Male Nudity," Art History, vol. 17, September 1994, pp. 301-41.

1.
See Donald J. Mrozek, Sport and American Mentality: 1880-1910 ( Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1983), p. 207.
2.
Quoted in Mason, Lithographs, p. 61.
3.
Theodore Roosevelt, Theodore Roosevelt--An Autobiography ( New York: Macmillan Co., 1913), p. 49.
4.
Letter from Bellows dated 10 June 1922 to William Milliken, then director of the Cleveland Museum of Art. Now in the archives of the Cleveland Museum of Art.
5.
See "Boxing Flourishing Here," New York Times, 16 November 1905, p. 12.
6.
For an account of the Dempsey and Firpo fight, see Jack Dempsey, Dempsey ( New York: Harper & Row, 1977).
7.
For an excellent study of boxing in America in the late eighteenth and nineteenth century, see Elliot J. Gorn , The Manly Art: Bare-Knuckle Prize Fighting in America ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986).
8.
The positive nature of boxing, as distinguished from prizefighting, and the paradox of such a distinction, was stated in a New York Times editorial of 7 April 1909 entitled "Prizefighting Not Easy to Suppress." On this day, prizefighting was called "unquestionably a great evil"--the evil element being money.

-250-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Critical Issues in American Art: A Book of Readings
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 328

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?