Commercial Aspects of Trusts and Fiduciary Obligations

By Ewan McKendrick | Go to book overview
Save to active project

INTRODUCTION

Sir Peter Millett

When I introduced the speakers at the second session of the Oxford Law Colloquium held at St John's College, Oxford, I suggested that the time had come to cease to use the expressions 'constructive trust' and 'constructive trustee' in relation to the recovery of misapplied assets. There are, indeed, powerful arguments for dispensing with the concepts themselves as having no relevance in this context. As Professor Birks demonstrates in Chapter 8, the accessory is not a trustee and his personal liability is not dependent on the existence of any trust; while I have argued elsewhere that the trust which is operating where a restitutionary claim has a proprietary base is a resulting and not a constructive trust. But I was concerned only to make a semantic point: the use of the language of constructive trust has become such a fertile source of confusion that it would be better if it were abandoned. Sometimes it is the necessary foundation for a proprietary claim, sometimes for a purely personal claim.

The use of the phrase 'constructive trustee' is even more confusing. The accessory, charged with 'knowing assistance' in the misdirection of the plaintiff's money, is held to be 'liable to account as constructive trustee'. As Professor Birks points out, the last three words add nothing. But they are worse than superfluous, they are misleading. The accessory is not a trustee, and he may never have received the trust property in any sense, ministerially or otherwise. I have argued elsewhere that the words mean that he is liable to account 'as if he was a constructive trustee (which, strictly speaking he is not)'. The danger is that he may be thought to mean that he is liable to account 'as a constructive trustee because he is one'.

It would help to reduce confusion if in future we were to abandon these phrases in relation to the recovery of the misapplied assets, and distinguish instead between personal and proprietary claims. The phrase 'constructive trust' would not, of course, disappear from our vocabulary. There is still a need for it, for example, in relation to proprietary claims in respect of what are now commonly called 'deemed agency gains'.

-3-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Commercial Aspects of Trusts and Fiduciary Obligations
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 297

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?