Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Shakespeare's Creation: The Language of Magic and Play

By: Kirby Farrell | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 230
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Notes

Part One

Introduction
Stanley Edgar Hyman, Iago: Some Approaches to the Illusion of His Motivation ( New York, 1970), p. 4.
Caroline Spurgeon, Shakespeare's Imagery ( Cambridge, 1935), p. ix.
Madeleine Doran Endeavors of Art ( Madison, 1954) comprehensively records the justifying intellectual maneuvers of Renaissance aestheticians, notably in its chapter on "Verisimilitude," pp. 53-74. I am aware that there are startling exceptions to my "rule," among them Minturno, who conceded that "great praise is due the poet who wins for feigned things a faith filled with wonder" ( Doran, p. 408). But as Minturno's juxaposition of "wonder" and "faith" may indicate, Renaissance critics as a group are strongly motivated toward certitude and the rationalization of art.
In Shakespearean Metadrama ( Minneapolis, 1971), James L. Calderwood argues at length that the plays "are not only about the various . . . thematic issues with which critics have so long and quite properly been busy but also about Shakespeare's plays. Not just 'the idea of the play' . . . but dramatic art itself . . . is a dominant Shakespearean theme, perhaps his most abiding subject" (p. 5).

What Calderwood calls "metadrama" Sigurd Burckhardt designates "intrinsic interpretation" in Shakespearean Meanings ( Princeton, 1968); more restricted than these is Lionel Abel Metatheatre: A New View of Dramatic Form ( New York, 1963); a metadramatic perspective is implied as well in Kenneth Burke's 1951 article on Othello, Leslie Fiedler "Shakespeare and the Paradox of Illusion," in The Collected Essays of Leslie Fiedler ( New York, 1971), Anne Righter Shakespeare and the Idea of the Play ( London, 1962), Philip Edwards ' Shakespeare and the Confines of Art ( London, 1968), and Herbert Wiesinger's "Theatrum Mundi: Illusion as Reality," in The Agony and the Triumph ( East Lansing, 1964).

King Leir, Malone Society Reprints, edited by W. W. Greg and R. Warwick Bond ( 1908), 11. 1232-33.

Chapter One
Readers have boldly rationalized the Sonnets from the start. John Benson's 1640 edition advertises them as "SEREN, cleare and eligantly plaine, such gentle straines as shall recreate and not perplex your brains, no

-230-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 256
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?