Midterm: The Elections of 1994 in Context

By Philip A. Klinkner | Go to book overview
Save to active project

10
Innovative Midterm Elections

DAVID R. MAYHEW1

For a party out of the White House, there is an age-old way to conduct midterm elections: Talk retrospective and make vague promises. The Republicans' "Had Enough?" campaign against the Truman administration in 1946 is a classic instance. In midterms, a retrospective focus makes sense because it is so inviting to blame everything on an incumbent president's two-year record. Vagueness helps along a "coalition-of-disaffected-minorities" strategy at a time when not having presidential candidates on the ballot lets House and Senate candidates run on local issues; what works in Alabama may not work in Rhode Island.

All the more surprising, then, that the Republicans of 1994 should present a campaign appeal--the Contract with America--that was both prospective and specific. For a congressional party, it broke new ground to commit hundreds of candidates to an action program and then use that program as respectively a campaign theme, a lens for interpreting the election outcome and a centerpiece for a "hundred-days" legislative drive. Many presidential candidates have acted out this familiar mandate scenario--consider Ronald Reagan's use of the Kemp-Roth tax cut plan in the 1980 campaign and subsequently in his 1981 budget--as have U.S. national parties more generally by writing platforms every four years and then sometimes paying attention to them after winning. But it was a first for a congressional party--more specifically, for just a House- of-Representatives party.

Of course, election mandates are largely a matter of social construction ( Hershey 1992): Who can be sure what voters intend when they vote or if their individual intentions can be successfully added up? But being socially constructed does not make a mandate any the less consequential. Believable electoral connections can be immensely consequential, as is evident in the records of William Gladstone, Woodrow Wilson, and others who pioneered in the genre of election programs and their governmental use. Perceived mandates can legitimize. Partly because presidents discovered this fact, the twentieth century presidency shot ahead of Congress in power. An intriguing question is whether congressional "contracts" like Newt Gingrich's, played out into the future, could serve as something of an institutional equalizer. Congress to president: "My mandate and hundred days are better than yours." Is this a possible future? We should stay tuned.

-157-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Midterm: The Elections of 1994 in Context
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 212

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?