Political Gerrymandering and the Courts

By Bernard Grofman | Go to book overview
Save to active project

The Unfinished Reapportionment Revolution

Gordon E. Baker

Toward the end of his life, Thomas Jefferson observed that "the generation which commences a revolution rarely completes it."1 The author of the Declaration of Independence here alluded to the difficulty of translating animating purposes or ideals into practice.

With this in mind, we might ponder the course of the reapportionment revolution in the quarter century since 1962. Now that state legislative and congressional constituencies reflect dose (at times almost precise) population equalities, does this indicate that the goals of this major institutional transformation have been fulfilled?

To answer this question, we must first probe the underlying conceptual framework of the decisions that Earl Warren later termed the most significant of his sixteen-year tenure as Chief Justice. Was the point of the one person, one vote rulings simply that of establishing equipopulous districts? A careful reading of these landmark opinions reveals more basic animating purposes, with population equality merely a means to the end.

In a much-quoted passage in the 1964 case of Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 ( 1964), Chief Justice Warren asserted that "the achieving of fair and effective representation for all citizens is concededly the basic aim of reapportionment" (pp. 565-566). But what constitutes "fair and effective representation"? The opinions of Warren and others in 1964 suggest at least three interrelated components: political equality of individual voters; majority rule rather than oligarchy; representative institutions that can reflect significant shifts in public opinion.

The Warren Court's approach to reapportionment revealed a profound judicial reassessment of the relationship between citizens and


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Political Gerrymandering and the Courts
Table of contents

Table of contents



Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 340

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?