SHARACHCHANDRA M. LÉLÉ
A Critical Review
The last few years have seen a dramatic transformation in the environmentdevelopment debate. The question being asked is no longer "Do development and environmental concerns contradict each other?" but "How can sustainable development be achieved?" All of a sudden the phrase Sustainable Development (SD) has become pervasive. . . . It appears to have gained the broad-based support that earlier development concepts such as "ecodevelopment" lacked, and is poised to become the developmental paradigm of the 1990s.
But murmurs of disenchantment are also being heard. "What is SD?" is being asked increasingly frequently without, however, clear answers forthcoming. SD is in real danger of becoming a cliché like appropriate technology--a fashionable phrase that everyone pays homage to but nobody cares to define. . . . Agencies such as the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development have been quick to adopt the new rhetoric. The absence of a clear theoretical and analytical framework, however, makes it difficult to determine whether the new policies will indeed foster an environmentally sound and socially meaningful form of development. . . .____________________
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Green Planet Blues:Environmental Politics from Stockholm to Tyoto. Edition: 2nd. Contributors: Ken Conca - Editor, Geoffrey D. Dabelko - Editor, Harrison Program on the Future Global Agenda - OrganizationName. Publisher: Westview Press. Place of publication: Boulder, CO. Publication year: 1998. Page number: 245.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.