Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century

By Peter Birks | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Personal Injuries in the Twenty First Century: Thinking the Unthinkable



It is one of the functions of the academic lawyer from time to time to think the unthinkable, and to challenge some of the most fundamental assumptions of our legal system. Few assumptions are more basic than the idea that if someone wrongfully does you an injury you should be entitled to sue him, and to think of abolishing this right without providing any real replacement is to go about as far as one can in thinking the unthinkable. Yet I want in all seriousness to float the suggestion that the action for damages for personal injuries should largely be abolished, and its replacement left to the free market. I shall also offer some reasons for thinking that the next century may well see some moves in this direction.

One of the principal reasons why this whole idea appears so unthinkable is that it confronts two powerful, though to some extent rival, ideologies, at the root of much of the legal system, and of the law of personal injuries in particular. One of these ideologies is, if one may for a moment be a little simplistic, that of the political right. This ideology concentrates on the position of the defendant in a personal injury action, and is rooted in the idea of personal responsibility. Margaret Thatcher was often credited, when she was in office, with defending tort liability as a system of personal responsibility. Everyone must be answerable at law for his own actions, and to think of abolishing liability for personal injuries is to fly in the face of everything which modern conservatism appears to stand for. The other ideology which thinking the unthinkable also confronts is closer to that of the modern Labour Party and appears to be a form of consumerism. According to this view the victims of accidents causing personal injury are entitled to some form of benefit like a welfare benefit, though it needs to be much more generous than the welfare benefits of the modern social security system. These injuries are often caused, on this view, by large corporations or public bodies who need to be kept in check and made to pay for their

I am grateful to Peter Cane and Jane Stapleton for reading this paper in draft and drawing my attention to a number of references which I had overlooked.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 333

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?