Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century

By Peter Birks | Go to book overview
Save to active project

11
Rethinking Penalty Clauses

T. A. DOWNES

The purpose of this paper is to reexamine the law relating to penalty clauses and related doctrines. The starting thesis is that a body of rules which was once radical in its approach is now out of step with the contemporary trends in the regulation of contractual clauses, that realignment of doctrine is not difficult to achieve, and that there are indications in recent decisions that the courts may be engaged in the task of modernising the law. It is now some twenty years since the Law Commission reexamined the law,1 and there are grounds to question its conclusion of the time that 'the application of the tests to distinguish between valid and invalid penalties . . . has, on the whole, worked satisfactorily.' Such questioning arises not so much from dissatisfaction with judicial decisions ostensibly based upon the present law but from doubts about whether in reaching these decisions the courts have truly adhered to the law as conventionally set out in the books. It is reinforced by the observation that civil law systems, while not disclaiming any power of control over penalty clauses, have operated from the presumption that such clauses should be given effect, as reflecting the will of the parties, and that any control must be seen as an exceptional measure. 2


GENERAL PRINCIPLES3

It was suggested at the beginning that the approach to the regulation of penalty clauses was radical at the time of its adoption. The basis for this remark is the parallel with the regulation of exclusion and limitation clauses. As is well known, until very recent times in general exemption clauses could not be subject to substantive evaluation; control was limited to peripheral doctrines such as the incorporation of terms and the principles of interpretation. Such doctrines were sometimes strained to the limit

____________________
1
Working Paper No.61, 1975.
2
For the definitive comparative treatment, see Treitel G. H., Remedies for breach of contract, OUP, 1988.
3
The common law principles set out here must be read in the light of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1994 (SI 1994 No.3159), which will be considered more closely below (see text at note 109).

-249-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Wrongs and Remedies in the Twenty-First Century
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 333

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?