Toxic Debts and the Superfund Dilemma

By Harold C. Barnett | Go to book overview
Save to active project


The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act enhanced EPA powers and circumscribed its discretion. It set the stage for a substantial increase in fund- and responsible party-financed cleanup activity, for environmentally effective and permanent cleanups, and for increased state and community involvement in cleanup decisions.

A redesign of EPA's implementation strategy was needed to meet these expectations. The goals of SARA would define the ends to be achieved while an incorporation of new powers would become the means. EPA did not pursue this course of action. Rather, the agency made modifications to its existing strategy and set fund conservation and the fulfillment of nonenvironmental performance goals as its primary ends. It soon became apparent that within the confines of its strategy, resources, and leadership, EPA could not align these ends with the environmental expectations of SARA or the broader expectations of an efficient and equitable program.

Superfund implementation continued to be constrained by Reagan administration hostility to environmental protection expenditures and by an EPA leadership resistant to change. The election of George Bush and the appointment of conservationist William Reilly to head EPA promised to resolve mounting conflicts between Congress and the agency. Acknowledging the need for a mid-course correction, Reilly soon produced a management review containing an insightful and straightforward evaluation of program failings. The review was followed by announcement of a new strategy built on the dual principles of enforcement first and worst sites first.

By late 1990 quantitative measures of Superfund activity suggested that the program was finally on the right track. EPA still faced the challenge of resolving other program-related conflicts initiated under the Reagan admin


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Toxic Debts and the Superfund Dilemma


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 334

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?