Decentralizing Urban Policy: Case Studies in Community Development

By Paul R. Dommel; John Stuart Hall et al. | Go to book overview
Save to active project

The Process and Its Outcomes

THE PRECEDING case studies permitted in-depth accounts of the local dynamics of the block grant process and decisions made during the transitional years of the community development block grant. In this chapter findings from the cases and from a larger field research sample (see chapter 1) are combined in an effort to examine the devolution of decisionmaking authority under the CDBG and to identify and compare those features of the block grant that were common to communities receiving grants.

The Changing Federal Role

Did the block grant result in reduced federal controls compared with the predecessor programs? Earlier it was noted that studies of urban renewal came to somewhat different conclusions about federal control of that program, depending on the city studied and where in the urban renewal process the research focused. The model cities program elicits more general agreement: it was intended to be primarily a "mayor's program" and was operated as such.

In neither the case studies nor the field network evaluation study (FNES) did we examine. federal controls over the pre-CDBG programs in a way that makes it possible to present a direct before-and-after comparison of such controls. However, from our examination of legislative intent, administrative implementation, and local perceptions, we conclude that at the beginning the block grant resulted in greater local discretion over development decisions.1

Some important features of the CDBG legislation produced greater

VICTOR E. BACH contributed to the preparation of this chapter.
Paul R. Dommel and others, Decentralizing Community Development ( U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, June 1978), chap. 3.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Decentralizing Urban Policy: Case Studies in Community Development


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 276

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?