Markets for Federal Water: Subsidies, Property Rights, and the Bureau of Reclamation

By Richard W. Wahl | Go to book overview
Save to active project

significant beneficiary of the salinity control program, especially in the Lower Basin.

The Reclamation Safety of Dams Act, passed in 1978 (92 Stat. 2471; 43 U.S.C. 506), was motivated in part by the failure of Teton Dam in Idaho in 1976. It provides for the Bureau of Reclamation to perform work to preserve the structural safety of bureau dams classified into one of two categories: (1) those being modified because of "new hydrologic or seismic data or changes in state-of-the-art criteria deemed necessary for safety purposes" and (2) those being modified owing to "age and normal deterioration of the structure or from nonperformance of reasonable and normal maintenance of the structure by the operating entity." In the first case, the costs are nonreimbursable; that is, there is a 100 percent subsidy for dam safety modifications in this category. In the second case, costs "will be allocated to the purposes for which the structure was authorized initially to be constructed and will be reimbursable as provided by existing law." The second provision means that, as dams age, they can be replaced with the same subsidy terms used for their original construction, such as the interest subsidy for irrigation. Work falling into the first category clearly receives a much greater degree of subsidy than the second, and it is a question of judgment as to how costs should be allocated between the two categories. The 1978 act authorized a total of $100 million for expenditures falling into either category.

In 1984 the Reclamation Safety of Dams Act Amendments (92 Stat. 1981; 43 U.S.C. 506) raised the cost ceiling by $650 million because the Bureau's 1984 list of dam safety modifications had a total estimated cost of $705 million (see U.S. General Accounting Office, 1986, pp. 21-24). The 1984 act also increased the level of nonfederal cost sharing from 0 percent to 15 percent for modifications in the first category--those deriving from new hydrologic or seismic data or changes in state-of-the-art safety criteria. The repayment period for irrigation was set at fifty years and at a level "capable of being repaid by the irrigation water users." Assuming a long-term government borrowing rate of 9 percent, interest-free repayment of 15 percent of costs over fifty years would provide a subsidy of 97 percent for the dam safety costs in this category that are allocated to irrigation.


Conclusions: Effects of the Irrigation Subsidy

Irrigation subsidies have generally been extended in favor of the water users through a variety of means, such as extension of the repayment period, deferment of repayment, and forgiveness of repayment on problem lands. Thus, a public program of irrigation stands in

-44-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Markets for Federal Water: Subsidies, Property Rights, and the Bureau of Reclamation
Table of contents
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 312

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?