Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Work and Pay in the United States and Japan

By: Clair Brown; Yoshifumi Nakata et al. | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 61
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Increased international competition has put pressure on U.S. firms to restrict the proportion of workers with income or job security and to increase the contingent work force. Similar pressures are at work in Japanese firms, and we expect this trend to become more visible as a secular adjustment when the Japanese recession ends. Overall, the labor market institutions in Japan have changed much more slowly than in the United States, and a much deeper economic crisis seems to be required before firms make adjustments in their practices to reduce costs. Even then, their adjustments tend to be marginal compared to the changes undertaken by U.S. companies facing intense global competition.

The 1990s recession has brought renewed emphasis to the benefits of employment security in the United States and to the costs of employment security in Japan. After analyzing the employee involvement, training, and wage systems, we will return in the concluding chapter to the question of what type of employment system, including security, would be effective in the United States, given its emphasis on mobility and individual autonomy and its macroeconomic institutions. We also discuss to what extent American (in)security practices are transferable to Japan.


NOTES
1.
Nondiscretionary expenditures are those that maintain a family's normal daily life and cannot be changed without disrupting the family's life-style. For a more complete discussion, see Vickery ( 1979).
2.
We distinguish this individual human capital, often referred to as general human capital, from organizational capital, which refers to skills and knowledge that are developed through experience on the job, are related to organizational activities, and are valuable only within the organization. Organizational capital includes relationships among employees; workers' knowledge of the firings culture and structure; workers' knowledge of rules and procedures; workers' experience in teaching certain skills to others; the firm's knowledge of workers' skills and talents; and proprietary knowledge (e.g., research-and-development secrets, financial data, supplier information). Although organizational capital might be thought of as specific capital, it is not solely embedded in one individual and may not become lost to the organization when that person quits or retires. Rather, organizational capital is embedded in groups and is learned incrementally. Therefore, the loss of capital to the organization when one individual leaves is quite small and can quickly be replaced with a minimal amount of job experience for the person who is transferred to the vacant job. However, if several people in a work group leave at one time, the training costs can be high since the natural training structure embedded in the work process has been destroyed.
3.
On the origins and dynamics of institutions in Japan, see Upham ( 1987) and Campbell ( 1992), and in the United States, see Jacoby ( 1985).
4.
These figures are for 1979, 1989, and 1991. The inflow is given as a percent of population aged 15-64 minus the unemployed; outflow is given as a percent of the total unemployed ( OECD, 1993a, pp. 88-89).

-61-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 246
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?