CHAPTER IX
THE MARSHALLIAN SURPLUS ANALYSIS

SINCE its inception in the first edition of the Principles in 1890, Marshall's doctrine of the surpluses, particularly his concept of the consumers' surplus, has been a perennial source of controversy. The nature of this controversy cannot be fully appreciated unless it is kept in mind that Marshall's doctrine in its original form has two aspects. The first consists in his broader views on the nature of economic activity and its relation to the surpluses in general. The second consists in his practical applications of the surplus analysis in its partial form.

Marshall's broader views on the subject may be found in various passages scattered throughout the Principles and in a compact form in the Appendix K. To critics sensitive to methodological purity, these passages seem to contain overtones of a particular philosophical point of view. Thus the objections to the surplus doctrine put forward by such leading critics as Profs. Knight and Robbins have been, on the whole, of a severely methodological character. Having, as they thought, found the "fountainhead of errors" in Marshall's Utilitarian philosophy and the labour-theory outlook, they were inclined to dismiss the entire surplus theory as being tainted at the source (cf. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, pp. 69-73).

From this, it is instructive to turn to the recent developments in the surplus analysis. These developments have no doubt been stimulated by the application of the Indifference Curve technique; but they are also partly due to a reversal in the direction of approach. The new champions of the surplus doctrine, notably Prof. Hicks, seem to have started from a study of Marshall's partial surplus analysis in action, in its actual applications to practical problems. Having thus found it to be a powerful instrument of analysis, designed to deal with those problems which are intractable to the ordinary marginal analysis, they have then proceeded to show us how it can be used without committing ourselves to Marshall's "philosophical preconceptions" real or imaginary ( J. R. Hicks, "Rehabilitation of Consumers' Surplus", Review of Economic Studies, Feb 1941, pp. 108-16).

In view of this it seems desirable to sort out Marshall's broader and more controversial opinions on the surpluses from his practical

-142-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Theories of Welfare Economics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 244

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?