Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Social Interaction, Social Context, and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp

By: Dan Isaac Slobin; Julie Gerhardt et al. | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 597
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

35 1
GENDER DIFFERENCES IN INTERRUPTIONS

Gisela Redeker
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

Anny Maes
Eindhovens Psychologisch Instituut


INTRODUCTION

The by now classic finding that men interrupt women more often than women interrupt men ( West & Zimmerman, 1983; Zimmerman & West, 1975) has never been uncontroversial (for recent reviews, see Aries, 1987, and James & Clarke, 1993). Many studies have failed to find significant differences between men's and women's interruptive behavior in mixed-gender groups (e.g., Beattie, 1981; Woods, 1989), mixed-gender dyads (e.g., Bilous & Krauss, 1988; Leet-Pellegrini, 1980; Marche & Peterson, 1993), or samegender interactions (e.g., Smith-Lovin & Brody, 1989; Marche & Peterson, 1993). Others report more interruptions by women than by men (e.g., Kennedy & Camden, 1983; Murray & Covelli, 1988; for same-gender interactions also Bilous & Krauss, 1988).

As James and Clarke ( 1993) and others before them have pointed out, there are many possible reasons for the divergence of these results: differences in the definitions of interruptions, the types of interaction studied, the individual characteristics of the participants such as age, social status, and institutional role, and, finally, differences in the size and composition of the groups studied. There are also methodological problems, for instance, inadequate quantitative comparisons. Most of the studies reviewed by James and Clarke ( 1993) compared raw counts of interruptions without taking speaking time into account. But raw counts can obviously be misleading unless men and women contribute equally to the interaction. The nine studies in the review that did use a measure that corrected for speaking time did not find any gender differences in mixedgender dyads or groups.

____________________
1
This research was conducted at Tilburg University with support from a senior research fellowship from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences to Redeker, and a grant from Stichting Diogenes, Tilburg, to Maes. We are grateful to the editors of this volume and to various colleagues for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this chapter.

-597-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 655
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?