Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Sixth Ezra: The Text and Origin

By: Theodore A. Bergren | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 28
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

TWO
Evidence for the
Text of 6 Ezra

PRIMARY EVIDENCE: THE MANUSCRIPTS

As noted in chapter 1, the primary textual base for 6 Ezra consists of eight Latin manuscripts that are known not to depend exclusively on any other extant manuscript of the work. They are as follows:

S Sangermanensis: Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale latin (11504-)11505; 82½2 C.E., from
St. Riquier, later at St. Germain des Prés
A Ambianensis: Amiens, Bibliothèque Communale 10; 9th c., from Corbie
C Complutensis 1: Madrid, Biblioteca de la Universidad Central 31; 9-10th c., from
Toledo or southern Spain, then at Alcalá de Heñares
M Mazarinaeus: Paris, Bibliothèque Mazarine (3-)4; 11-12th c., from les Cordeliers
(Paris)
N Bruxellensis: Brussels, Bibliothèque Royale ler Série (9107-)9109(-9110); 12th c.,
origin unknown
E Epternacensis: Luxembourg, Bibliothèque Nationale 264; 1051-1081 C.E., from
Echternach
V Abulensis: Madrid, Biblioteca Nacional vitr. 15-1; 12-13th c., from Ávila
L Legionensis 2: León, Real Colegiata de San Isidoro I,3; 1162 C.E., from León

To these witnesses, which also form the main textual base for 5 Ezra and for the Latin version of 4 Ezra, must be added the fourth-century Greek fragment of 15:57-59 found at Oxyrhynchus (X).

In the case of the Latin version of 4 Ezra, the reason for limiting the number of complete significant manuscripts to these eight is well known. They are the only Latin manuscripts that contain (or contained, in the case of S) the celebrated "missing fragment" of 4 Ezra 7:36-105. Accounts of the unpublished discovery of this lost section in manuscript C by J. Palmer, the independent deduction of its existence by J. Gildemeister, and finally its discovery in manuscript A and publication by R. L. Bensly are readily available 1 and need not be repeated here. It suffices to state that the "missing

-28-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 284
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?