Economic Foreign Policy of the United States

By Benjamin H. Williams | Go to book overview
Save to active project


For purposes of commercial expansion the most-favored- nation clause, formerly the neglected step-child of American diplomacy, has in recent years been arrayed in new garments and brought forth to be introduced to the society of a somewhat reticent world. It has been shown that, with the revolution in the international economic status of the United States, the program of seeking special concessions for exports has given way to one of demanding equality of treatment from other nations. One agency for the obtaining of equal treatment abroad has been the penalty provision of Sec. 317 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which is to be used in retaliation for failure to give equality. The most-favored-nation clause has now been refashioned into an agency for securing the same result by more pacific means. The story of the radical change in the American attitude toward this clause may be somewhat tedious but it is necessary to an understanding of the evolution of the commercial policy of the United States.


The agreement of two nations to give to each other the same treatment that they extend to most-favored-nations has been called the "cornerstone of all modern commercial treaties."1 Such a declaration, because of its important effect on subsequent agreements not contemplated at the time of making the original treaty, has been subjected to the most intense scrutiny. The interpretation of the clause, the determination of its effect upon other commercial treaty provisions, and the decision as to the particular form in which the promise shall be expressed have given rise to many difficulties.

For the purpose of analyzing the effect of the clause and its problems, it may be useful to represent the three countries in

HORNBECK STANLEY K., "The Most-favored-nation Clause," Amer. Jour. of International Law, Vol. III, p. 395.


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Economic Foreign Policy of the United States


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 428

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?