with
Patrick Caddell and Gerald RafshoonIn commenting on the close election of 1976, Jimmy Carter said flatly that "if it hadn't been for the debates, I would have lost. They established me as competent on foreign and domestic affairs and gave the viewers reason to think that Jimmy Carter has something to offer." Carter's assessment raises a series of questions:
| Did he "win" the debates in the sense that he was superior to President Ford? | |
| Did the debates change the minds of voters; that is, did they shift votes from Ford to Carter? | |
| If Carter would have lost the election except for the debates, what may we infer about their value for the future? | |
| If they helped Carter, did they hurt Ford? | |
| Did they provide a service to the electorate of sufficient magnitude to institutionalize debates? |
| 1. | The debates helped both candidates by diminishing, if not eradicating, the general publics negative perceptions of each. |
| 2. | Carter was the greater beneficiary because his likely presidential performance was less "known." |
| 3. | "Winning" or "losing" the debates had an insignificant impact on the electorate for both candidates. |
| 4. | The outcome of the debates changed few votes; in the Carter campaign, the debates were planned to shore up perceived weaknesses among likely supporters rather than to expand support. |
| 5. | Although Carter undoubtedly is right that he would have lost the election without the essential forum of the debates, the debates |
-137-
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Book title: The Past and Future of Presidential Debates.
Contributors: Austin Ranney - Editor.
Publisher: American Enterprise Institute.
Place of publication: Washington, DC.
Publication year: 1979.
Page number: 137.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset