Courts, and Crime Control
Valerie P. Hans and Jonathan D. Casper
Criminal trials provide engaging and lively entertainment, but do the proceedings in the courtroom have any bearing on people's willingness to support the justice system and to comply with the law? Although a direct relationship between the work of trial courts and crime rates is difficult to discern, several arguments point to an indirect link between the criminal trial and legal compliance. First, scholars have argued that trials hold broad symbolic significance for a society, teaching lessons about the nature of law and legal institutions. Second, the jury that decides the case is said to be an important symbol of the role of the public in the legal process, which helps to provide legitimacy for the system and its verdicts. Third, the direct participation in the legal system that jurors experience is claimed to increase support for the legal system. A legal system that is seen as legitimate is more likely to encourage compliance with the law. In this chapter we review theoretical arguments and empirical research pertaining to the symbolic and other significance of the criminal jury trial and to the ways in which it may be related to crime control.
The overall theme of this volume (and the Stanford Criminal justice Conference, on which it is based) is the relationship between criminal justice institutions and the rate and type of crime in society. We begin our inquiry with the sense that the relationship of trials and their outcomes to crime
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: The Crime Conundrum:Essays on Criminal Justice. Contributors: Lawrence M. Friedman - Editor, George Fisher - Editor. Publisher: Westview Press. Place of publication: Boulder, CO. Publication year: 1997. Page number: 93.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.