Automation Technology and Human Performance: Current Research and Trends

By Mark W. Scerbo | Go to book overview
Save to active project

Driver Support and Automated Driving Systems: Acceptance and Effects on Behavior

Dick de Waard and Karel A. Brookhuis

Centre for Environmental and Traffic Psychology University of Groningen, The Netherlands


From manual control to full automation five different grades of automation can be discerned ( Endsley & Kiris, 1995). Starting from (1) no automation, via (2) decision support, (3) consensual Artificial Intelligence (AI), (4) monitored AI to (5) full automation, authority of the human being decreases, while the role of the system increases. In (1) a (cognitive) task is accomplished without any assistance, while in (2) automation provides advice. In (3) the system proposes actions and the operator's consent is required while in (4) the operator can only veto actions initiated by the system. In full automation the operator can and does not interact with the automated system at all (see also Endsley, 1996). Similar to aviation, automation in surface travel ranges from manual control to completely automated driving. Most systems that are low in level of automation do not restrict the driver's behavior. A system such as RDS-TMC (Radio Data System - Traffic Message Channel) provides the driver with information on congestion. Such a system is an indirect route-guidance system, leaving the decision to take another route to the driver. Automation is at the level of "decision support", according to Endsley's classification. At the other extreme there is automated driving, such as in the Automated Highway System (AHS, e.g., Congress, 1994). In the AHS cars exchange information with the road infrastructure and with each other, enabling automatic lateral (steering) and longitudinal (speed and headway) control. Only when cars are in the AHS or on dedicated lanes, they will be under automatic control. Advantages of AHS include increased road capacity, increased operation in bad weather and reduction or even elimination of driver error. The latter claim is based on the assumption that drivers will not be allowed to take over control while driving on the AHS, which is still a point of discussion ( Tsao et al., 1993). As one of the aims of AHS is to increase road capacity, cars will probably drive at short following distances, at time headways that are beyond human reaction time. AHS is likely to leave very little, if any, behavioral freedom in actual driving (i.e., in headway and speed control), and is the highest level of automation.

Michon ( 1985) has described driving as a task with processes at three levels. At the top level, the strategic level, strategic decisions are made, such as the choice of means of transport, setting of a route goal, and route-choice while driving. At the intermediate level, the maneuvering level, reactions to local situations including reactions to the behavior of other traffic participants take place. At the lowest level, the control level, the basic vehicle-control processes occur, such as lateral-position control. Automation in driving can take place at all three levels. The earlier mentioned RDS-TMC provides the driver with strategic information, while the AHS has full operational control. At the tactical level information or tutoring systems can inform drivers about their behavior. These tutoring systems can range from silent black-box policing systems to environmental feedback systems. In Figure I some of these systems are categorized according to the level of automation and the level of process that are automated.

Goals of Automation

According to Wickens ( 1992) there are 3 goals of automation, each serving a different purpose. There is 1) automation to perform tasks humans cannot perform at all, or 2) automation to perform tasks


Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this page

Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Automation Technology and Human Performance: Current Research and Trends
Table of contents

Table of contents



Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 348

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?