Race and Ethnic Conflict: Contending Views on Prejudice, Discrimination, and Ethnoviolence

By Fred L. Pincus; Howard J. Ehrlich | Go to book overview
Save to active project

same disparities lead him to question the conceptualization of policy. Roth argues that this conceptualization is based on the elitist and political bias of social scientists and that these disparities are "real." Jones argues that the expressions of prejudice have changed over time. From the research literature, he identifies three forms of expression--symbolic racism, modern racism, and aversive racism.

Symbolic racism is based on prejudice where the content of the attitude is the conjunction of (1) inappropriate beliefs and demands by blacks regarding civil rights and (2) the belief that discrimination has already been neutralized. Continuing black demands for government assistance are, therefore, seen as violating traditional norms of achievement and merit. Government policies such as court- ordered school busing and affirmative action are viewed as unnecessary and violating white civil rights. Modern racists, according to Jones, hold similar views regarding discrimination and the violation of norms. Both symbolic racists and modern racists believe that they are not prejudiced and that their beliefs are realistically grounded. The differences between the two conceptualizations are slight and are matters of emphasis. The modern racist tends to respond to the target of prejudice directly, in a more stereotyped manner and with a strong emotional loading. Symbolic racists tend to respond indirectly to the target of prejudice by focusing on social policies that affect group relations (busing, school desegregation, affirmative action). Aversive racists, in contrast, express their attitudes toward blacks in emotional responses--discomfort, disgust, fear, and so on. Like the others, aversive racists do not view themselves as being prejudiced.

The divergences of Roth and Jones illustrate three facets of the complexity of the study of prejudice. The first is how the changing relations between groups is reflected in the changes in the content of attitudes. The second is how these changing attitudes can be differently interpreted by scientists of differing political perspectives. Finally, both authors introduce the reader to the differences in the perceptions of blacks and whites. These differences are reflected in many of the selections in Part Three.


REFERENCES

Ehrlich, Howard J. ( 1973) The Social Psychology of Prejudice. New York: Wiley.

-64-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Race and Ethnic Conflict: Contending Views on Prejudice, Discrimination, and Ethnoviolence
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 466

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?