| a. | that the abatement notice is not justified by section 80 of the 1990 Act (summary proceedings for statutory nuisances); | ||
| b. | that there has been some informality, defect or error in, or in connection with, the abatement notice, or in, or in connection with, any copy of the abatement notice served under section 80A(3)6 (certain notices in respect of vehicles, machinery or equipment); | ||
| c. | that the authority have refused unreasonably to accept compliance with alternative requirements, or that the requirements of the abatement notice are otherwise unreasonable in character or extent, or are unnecessary; | ||
| d. | that the time, or where more than one time is specified, any of the times, within which the requirements of the abatement notice are to be complied with is not reasonably sufficient for the purpose; | ||
| e. | where the nuisance to which the notice relates--
|
-753-
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Book title: A Manual of Environmental Protection Law:The Pollution Control Functions of the Environment Agency and SEPA.
Contributors: Michael Fry - Author.
Publisher: Clarendon Press.
Place of publication: Oxford.
Publication year: 1997.
Page number: 753.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset