Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Religion and Sexism: Images of Woman in the Jewish and Christian Traditions

By: Rosemary Radford Ruether | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 147
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

closer to gnosticism than to Christianity, has been that women have been effectively removed from public influence in the Church. One might on rare occasion become a saint, but certainly not a priest; one might become a teacher, but certainly not a theologian or bishop. The consequence of this distorted spirituality and skewed social reality has been that women have been precluded from receiving or ever developing fully responsible and equal roles in the Church's spiritual, theological and institutional life.

The present-day church, in order to recover its kinship with the primitive Christian message, will have to overcome this sexist dualism and dare to live out in all areas of its institutional and spiritual life this first-generation formula of "neither male nor female" in Christ. Not until the Church overcomes this spiritual dualism and social negation of women by again recovering the theological vision of itself as a people of promise, unfolding the new creation, will it again discover the absolutely unique theological insight and profound social meaning of Paul's "neither male nor female" in Christ. It was neither social reality alone nor spirituality alone to which Paul gave new definition. To be "in Christ" was to be party to the ushering in of an entirely new mode of human existence.


NOTES
1.
Peter Ketter, Christ and Womankind ( Westminster, Md.: Newman Press, 1952), p. 21.
2.
Samuel Dill, Roman Society from Nero to Marcus Aurelius ( New York: Macmillan and Co., 1905), p. 79.
4.
Ketter, Christ and Womankind, pp. 21-24.
5.
Until the reign of Justinian a woman could not be appointed a guardian, even over her own children. See J. P. V. D. Balsdon, Roman Women; Their History and Habits ( London: Bodley Head, 1962), p. 275.
6.
Rome had a much larger concept of subordination than simply that of subordination of women to men. A man was unimportant in comparison with his family, a citizen unimportant in comparison to the body of citizens. Persons were subordinated to the group, and because of this social structure some women in powerful families achieved very-high-status positions.
7.
Balsdon, Roman Women, p. 276.

-147-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 360
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?