lishment clause, would be a latent explosive planted in the document. When the convention of 1967 recommended a constitution without that provision, the bomb would explode.
The 1894 convention manifested, to a degree greater than at any previous time in New York's history, the tension between urban and rural New York. This tension is most clearly evident in the arguments over apportionment, but it is also obvious in the suffrage amendments, the dual registration system for urban and rural areas, the separation of city from state and national elections, and the delegates' unwillingness to grant any significant home rule power to the cities. The vision of a rural republic, Protestant and Republican, and that of an urban democracy, ethnic and Democratic, provided the ideological and cultural context for many of the delegates at the convention.
The convention succeeded in providing some protection for traditional New Yorkers against a new order emerging from a combination of immigration, urbanization, and industrialization. The concern of many Republicans to preserve a New York they believed was slipping away, combined with the inability of independent and city Republicans to unite on a coherent response to this emerging order, accounts for the lack of theoretical coherence at the convention.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Ordered Liberty:A Constitutional History of New York. Contributors: Peter J. Galie - Author. Publisher: Fordham University Press. Place of publication: New York. Publication year: 1996. Page number: 184.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.