The U.S. Man-Made Fiber Industry: Its Structure and Organization since 1948

By David I. Goldenberg | Go to book overview
Save to active project

7
Nonprice Rivalry

Rivalry occurs among firms that vie for patronage by means aside from price competition. Competing solely on price makes sense only when the classical free enterprise model's premises, notably homogeneous goods and firms-both suppliers and customers--holds true. Although simpler analytically and more apt to yield definite equilibria, price competition seldom produces an even temporarily positive economic profit greater than zero. Hence, the few business executives aware of these facts are unlikely to try to deduce practical strategies from this model, while those less well informed are unlikely to learn how they erred. As a premise of undifferentiated goods and firms demonstrably does not fit the U.S. man-made fibers industry after 1948, the various sorts of rivalry used by the firms composing this industry, either instead of or to supplement price competition, merit consideration.

Rivalry based on nonprice activities resists assessment. Its effects are extremely hard to quantify in both theory and practice. Such efforts also are often inherently subjective in character and therefore notoriously hard to evaluate objectively. The crucial matter of the direction of causality is so uncertain as to often be indeterminate. For instance, one intuitively expects advertising to produce sales, and not the reverse. But what is causality's true direction if, as often happens, this year's advertising budget is set as a fixed proportion of sales one, two or more calendar years ago? Then, either sales cause advertising or both are inextricably interdependent. Uncertainty about the timing and the effects of nonprice activities further complicates the problem of evaluation. Nevertheless, an attempt was made to understand and quantify rivalry in the U.S. man-made fibers industry including its trade-offs with price. This originally was done to better understand and predict price versus nonprice trade-offs in the U.S. man-made fibers industry. Only later was the question raised about whether the method has general merit. This chapter's first major section treats these issues.

Economists theoretically know how to optimize any mix of price and nonprice activities. In theory, one need only do four things. First, ratio each input's--including nonprice activities--marginal physical product to its price. Second, track those

-129-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
The U.S. Man-Made Fiber Industry: Its Structure and Organization since 1948
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 286

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?