11. Democratizing the American Economy: Illusions and Realities of Employee Participation and Ownership CATHERINE J. IVANCIC AND JOHN LOGUE In 1906 the German sociologist Werner Sombart published a provocative book titled Warum gibt es in den Vereinigten Staaten keinen Sozialismus? (Why is there no Socialism in the United States?). His problem was a simple one. The United States was the world's most advanced capitalistic country. Yet, despite Marx, it had the weakest socialist movement in the industrial world. Here was American exceptionalism at its most outrageous: a direct violation of the laws of history and of scientific socialism. 1 American exceptionalism has frustrated many Europeans since Sombart's day, including most of those interested in industrial and economic democracy. In industrial democracy--which we define as employee participation in management at the department, plant, and company level--and economic democracy--defined as employee co-ownership--the United States defies generalization drawn from other industrial nations' experience. It is not that the United States is genuinely sui generis; there are certainly points of commonality with the experience of other industrial democracies. Yet the patterns of American historical development in this area, as in so many others, are different from those of European democracies. When the European nations established works councils in the aftermath of World War II, the American wartime equivalents were rapidly dismantled. Although American military authorities in Germany accepted codetermination in the coal and steel industries in the American and British occupation zones, there was no presumption that comparable measures were desirable in the United States. As one European nation after another moved to expand organized labor's influence inside larger corporations in the 1960s and 1970s through various forms of consultation, codetermination, expanded bargaining rights, and board representation, the issue of an expansion of labor's influence was never placed on the American political agenda. Yet the United States, where the idea of industrial and economic democracy long seemed moribund, has begun to move in the same direction as its European counterparts. Since the mid-1970s, the issues of employee participation and ownership have been brought to the fore within the American private sector. Characteristically, it has occurred with the same disregard for the "laws of history" -215- |