Human-Computer Interaction: Ergonomics and User Interfaces - Vol. 1

By Hans-Jörg Bullinger; Jürgen Ziegler | Go to book overview
Save to active project
and a low level of mental workload during the sixth trial. At the same time, psychophysiological variables indicated a moderate level of arousal. Differences between groups were marginal. These results reflect the successful coping with deficits in temporal aspects of work concerning SRT subdivisions. Regardless whether such deficits were present or not, all subjects expended a similar amount of effort in performing the task, and they all felt comfortable while working.However, similar efforts resulted in different levels of performance. In comparison with subjects working under an optimal subdivision of total SRT, subjects working under a sub-optimal subdivision served relatively few customers, and they made no particular efforts as to avoid errors. But this way of dealing with the task enabled them to keep subjective costs low.After all, it can be concluded that poor performance during computer work can be prevented by optimizing SRT duration. Optimal SRTs will be obtained when using graphic representations of SRTs to be adjusted by the subject. This procedure is very simple to learn. Tools for graphic subdivision of total SRT can be easily programmed with each modern computer. They should be applied as standard tools for determining the optimal SRTs whenever developing interactive computer tasks. For achieving a high user satisfaction and a high efficiency of computer work, SRTs should always be optimized.
References
Kohlisch, O., & Kuhmann, W. ( 1997). "System response time and readiness for task execution - the optimum duration of inter-task delays". Ergonomics, 40, 265-280.
Luce, R. D. & Krumhansl, C. L. ( 1988). "Measurement, Scaling and Psychphysics". In Atkinson R. C., Heffnstein R. J., Lindzey G. & Luce R. D. (Eds.), Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Vol. 1: "Perception and Motivation", pp. 3-74. Chichester: Wiley.
Schaefer, F., & Kohlisch, O. ( 1995). "The effect of anticipatory mismatch in work flow on task performance and event related brain potentials". In Grieco A., Molteni G., Piccoli B., & Occhipinti E. (Eds.), Work with display units 94, pp. 241-245. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Thum, M., Boucsein, W., Kuhmann, W., & Ray, W. J. ( 1995). "Standardized task strain and system response times in human-computer interaction". Ergonomics, 38, 1342-1351.
Author's present address: IfADo Institut fuer Arbeitsphysiologie, Ardeystrasse 67, D-44139 Dortmund, Germany. Email:kohlisch@arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de

-204-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Human-Computer Interaction: Ergonomics and User Interfaces - Vol. 1
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 1356

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?