Human-Computer Interaction: Ergonomics and User Interfaces - Vol. 1

By Hans-Jörg Bullinger; Jürgen Ziegler | Go to book overview
Save to active project

model when the development meeting is called to analyse the users' work situation, may inhibit the recording of potentially significant contributions which are made in the meeting. It may be more effective to focus a meeting on the relevant form of model but also to have permanently visible, and accessible for changes, other forms of representation and structuring. For example, when prototyping it might be productive also to have available modifiable task models and requirements specifications in which to assimilate contributions to work situation analysis or design and requirements analysis.

A key question remains: what forms of representation may provide effective support for cooperative requirements analysis? Such external shared representations must both present the recorded specification of previously determined requirements and facilitate the identification and public recording of new requirements. Crucially, they must be comprehensible and modifiable by both professional developers and users.

A potential partial solution to underspecification is to involve the implementors as participants in the earlier development activities, so making them partners in the personal common ground which is constructed therein. This, however, is not an approach which could be followed in many software development situations, especially very large projects with multiple development teams each with several members. The most effective and efficient means of resolving specification and implementation gaps due to gaps in common ground is likely to remain rapid iteration around the design, evaluate, redesign cycle.


4
References

Clark, H. H. ( 1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

O'Neill, E. J. ( 1996). Task model support for cooperative analysis. Proceedings of CHI'96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Companion, pp. 259-60. New York: ACM Press.

O'Neill, E., Johnson, P. & Johnson, H. ( 1999). "Representations and userdeveloper interaction in cooperative analysis and design". Human Computer Interaction, 14 ( 1).

Palmer, S. E. ( 1978). "Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation". In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. B. (Eds.): Cognition and categorization, pp. 259-303. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Rudd, J., Stern, K. & Isensee, S. ( 1996). Low vs high-fidelity prototyping debate. Interactions, January 1996, pp. 76-85.

Schuler, D. & Namioka, A. ( 1993). Participatory design: principles and practices. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

-922-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Human-Computer Interaction: Ergonomics and User Interfaces - Vol. 1
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 1356

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?