Environmental Injustice in the United States: Myths and Realities

By James P. Lester; David W. Allen et al. | Go to book overview
Save to active project

other factors, a risk-based approach would direct more resources to these communities. Indeed, a risk-based approach would give highest priority to attacking precisely the kinds of problems that concern Bullard ( Nichols, 1994: 268).

Other scholars have argued for setting meaningful priorities for risk reduction and cost-effective pollution control policies ( Andrews, 1998; Helfand and Peyton, 1999; Portney, 1991). Still others argue for environmental policies that combine both equity and risk assessment (see, e.g., Kraft and Scheberle, 1995: 113-121; Sexton, Anderson, and Adgate, 1999). The uniformity of the call for a risk-based solution, based on different arguments and different methods of analysis, would seem to lend a high degree of credibility to our rationality-equity-efficiency analysis, which has also arrived at the same preferred risk-based solution selected by other policy analysts.


Conclusion

This book has covered a wide range of topics associated with the question of environmental justice in the United States. We started with the nature of the problem in Chapter 1, reviewed the existing evidence in Chapter 2, and outlined how the question arrived on the agenda in Chapter 3. In Chapters 4-8, we outlined a wide range of statistical analysis that clearly articulated the scope and nature of the problem confronting the nation. In Chapter 9, we outlined actions by the federal and state governments designed to deal with aspects of the problem. Finally, Chapter 10 assessed the arguments about how to deal with the problem in a far more systematic and coherent fashion that has been heretofore attempted. This long journey has allowed us to recommend future directions for policy development that are based on rationality, equity, and efficiency. In doing so, we have argued that a risk-based solution would be the most desirable policy option for dealing with the problem.

Thus, we will close with the admonition made by Aaron Wildavsky some years ago:

Whatever the combination, speaking truth to power remains the ideal of analysts who hope they have truth, but realize they have not power. No one can do analysis without becoming aware that moral considerations are integral to the enterprise. After all, analysis is about what ought to be done, about making things better, not worse ( Wildavsky, 1979: 12-13).

It is our fervent hope that this policy analysis will make the problem of environmental injustice much better and not worse. After all, policy analysis is about improvement--about improving governmental and citizen deci

-187-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Environmental Injustice in the United States: Myths and Realities
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen
/ 216

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?