production controls is the reduction of government costs and the level of antagonism among traders in the world market for dairy products even though smaller farm preservation is undoubtedly also a factor. In the United States, the pressure for controls results from a combination of the desire to lower government costs, raise milk prices and preserve a moderately sized, dairy farm structure. The lack of consensus is the result of diversity and regionalism that is developing within the US dairy industry. Both Republican and Democratic administrations are opposed to production controls because they run counter to freer trade objectives and reduce competitiveness.
This discussion also raises important issues regarding the role of producer-oriented institutions in an economic environment of freer trade. The answer is quite simple. Under conditions of free trade, producer-oriented institutions, such as cooperatives or marketing boards, should do whatever is required to keep farmers competitive in the marketplace. This involves promoting progressiveness in both production and marketing. It begins with support of progressive, basic and applied research at universities. It includes facilitating the transfer of technology to farmers as a means of leveling the playing field. It involves providing milk processors with services (such as forage quality testing, soil testing and cow milker training), product development, minimum quality standards and aggressiveness in exporting as well as in domestic marketing. It is only through such progressive institutions that an industry expects to remain competitive. This is the case regardless of which long-run policy scenario is pursued.
Cropp, R. 1995. "The California Milk Price Stabilization Program". Dairy Markets and Policy: Issues and Options O-10. Cornell University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ithaca, NY.
Fallert, R. F., D. P. Blayney, and J. J. Miller. 1990. Dairy: Background for 1990 Farm Legislation. Commodity Economics Division, ERS/USDA (March).
GAO/RCED. 1993. Dairy Industry Potential for and Barriers to Market Development 94-19. Washington, DC (December).
Gruebele, J. W. 1978. "Effects of Removing the Dairy Price-Support Program". Illinois Agricultural Economics 18: 30-38.
Kaiser, H. M. 1986. Mandatory Supply Management Programs in Canada and Europe. Cornell Agricultural Economics Staff Paper No. 86-21, Cornell University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Ithaca, NY.
Knutson, R. D., J. B. Penn, and W. T. Boehm. 1995. Agricultural and Food Policy. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Manchester, A. 1983. The Public Role in the Dairy Economy: Why and How Governments Intervene in the Milk Business. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Book title: Regulation and Protectionism under GATT:Case Studies in North American Agriculture. Contributors: Andrew Schmitz - Editor, Garth Coffin - Editor, Kenneth A. Rosaasen - Editor. Publisher: Westview Press. Place of publication: Boulder, CO. Publication year: 1996. Page number: 94.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.