Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Western Frontiers of Imperial Rome

By: Steven K. Drummond; Lynn H. Nelson | Book details

Contents
Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Page 147
Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

The test of their vitality often came when the local garrisons were posted elsewhere and the frontier moved on. Many of these settlements failed, or their residents simply followed the troops. Many others succeeded, however, and developed an economic life independent of purely military markets. Some of the great cities of the Rhine-Danube region--Cologne, Coblenz, Mainz, Vienna, Belgrade, Budapest-- arose in just such a fashion.

There are few great monuments of Roman civil culture to be found in the region of the old frontier, and urban life there was primitive by Roman standards. 42 One must remember, however, that many of the cities of the interior were artificial creations. They were centers of trade and commerce because the government had decreed that they be so, and they disposed of wealth amassed from slave labor, war booty, and the generally favorable economic conditions created by the government's unequal taxation of the eastern provinces of the empire. The frontier towns enjoyed none of these advantages, but arose purely in response to the economic needs and opportunities of the frontier. 43 They were functioning economic communities of artisans and merchants, and differences in wealth and social standing among their residents were comparatively small and lightly regarded. In this sense, at least, the frontier towns were distinguished by their relative freedom and equality.


Notes
1.
It might be better to say that they were ambivalent. Public life was concentrated in cities, and neither labor nor expense was spared in embellishing those cities and providing them with amenities. The Romans seemed to take great pleasure in the crowds, markets, and hustle and bustle of their cities. At the same time, however, these same Romans, particularly the upper classes, longed for the quiet and repose of their country estates. Those whose station in life and resources permitted it alternated their time between city and country, fully content with neither.
2.
The Roman city-state was generally about the same area as an American county, and served many of the same functions. There was a great variety in size, wealth, and population among them, however. Some were relatively small towns, and some had populations of several thousands. In cases where a district did not possess a single concentration of population, the Roman government often allowed the villages of a district to confederate and assume the status of a city-state. Such an administrative area was called a saltus. Although the city-states differed widely in size and appearance, their local institutions were set by law and were virtually identical throughout the empire.

-147-

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
of 278
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?