Gettysburg--Culp's Hill and Cemetery Hill

By Harry W. Pfanz | Go to book overview

APPENDIX B TWO CONTROVERSIES

The battle of Gettysburg engendered several controversies. Three of the better known ones were those between Generals Longstreet and Early, between General Sickles and General Meade and his partisans, and between Generals Hancock and Hunt. None of these spats were to the credit of the participants and are significant principally because they prompted the preparation of accounts of portions of the battle that might not have been written otherwise.

Two lesser controversies relate to the subject of this monograph. One involved Generals Howard and Hancock. The battle of Gettysburg was a high point in the life of each, and each man was jealous of his reputation and did not wish to see it diminished. Howard wrote Samuel P. Bates in 1875 that he had taken "especial pride in Gettysburg, and man therefore perhaps unduly sensitive at adverse criticism." 1

The controversy began with the mischievous action of Congress. That august body, in gratitude for the victory of the Army of the Potomac at Gettysburg, passed a resolution on 28 January 1864 thanking three officers by name for their contributions to the victory. The first was General Hooker for shielding Washington and Baltimore from the "meditated blow" of General Lee; the second and third were Generals Meade and Howard for the victory at Gettysburg. Had the solons confined their expressions to Hooker and Meade, there would have been no hard feelings, but it was foolish and invidious of them to single out Howard from his peers for this honor. 2

The resolution prompted criticism that surfaced in a letter to the editor written by "TRUTH" on 20 February 1864 in the Army and Navy Journal. "TRUTH" gave an account of the battle and asked why Howard had been singled out for thanks over Hancock. "One Who Knows" replied on 19 March with an account extolling Howard's activities and saying that Hancock did not assume command when he arrived on the field. "TRUTH" could not let this pass and replied that Hancock had taken command and that many people had seen him do so. 3

The central issue then became whether Howard or Hancock commanded on the field after Hancock's arrival. That Hancock was in command could not be disputed since General Meade had so ordered. The question was whether Hancock exercised this command over Howard and which officer should be credited for the rallying of Union forces on Cemetery Hill.

The two principals exchanged views on the matter. On 25 February Howard wrote to Hancock regarding an article in the Philadelphia Evening Bulletin that spoke favorably of Hancock and critically of him. Howard said that he hoped that the article did not express Hancock's views, and he wrote in a complimentary way of Hancock's services on 1 July. He went on to say that he had had no prior knowledge of the resolution by Congress and did not know even then who was behind it.

-379-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
Gettysburg--Culp's Hill and Cemetery Hill
Table of contents

Table of contents

  • Title Page ii
  • Contents vii
  • Maps ix
  • Illustrations xi
  • Preface xv
  • Acknowledgments xvii
  • 1 - The Generals and Their Armies 1
  • 2 - The Only Position 15
  • 3 - Ewell and Howard Collide 31
  • 4 - Retreat to Cemetery Hill 45
  • 5 - The Rebels Take the Town 59
  • 6 - Ewell Hesitates 71
  • 7 - Slocum and Hancock Reach the Field 88
  • 8 - Getting Ready for the Fight 106
  • 9 - Skirmishers, Sharpshooters, and Civilians 129
  • 10 - Brinkerhoff's Ridge 153
  • 11 - The Artillery, 2 July 168
  • 12 - Blunder on the Right 190
  • 13 - Johnson Attacks! 205
  • 14 - Early Attacks Cemetery Hill 235
  • 15 - Cemetery Hill- the Repulse 263
  • 16 - Culp's Hill- Johnson's Assault, 3 July 284
  • 17 - The Last Attacks 310
  • 18 - Counterattacks near Spangler's Spring 328
  • 19 - 3 July, Mostly Afternoon 353
  • 20 - Epilogue 365
  • Appendix A - Spangler's Spring 377
  • Appendix B - Two Controversies 379
  • Appendix C - Order of Battle: Army of the Potomac and Army of Northern Virginia, 1-3 July 1863 383
  • Notes 407
  • Bibliography 471
  • Index 489
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 510

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.