International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration - Vol. 2

By Jay M. Shafritz | Go to book overview

strike in the face of a certain fatal retaliation. The irrationality of the launch of a nuclear attack in the context of MAD is undeniable. And yet, it is possible that the only certain means of deterring a nuclear attack on oneself or one's allies is to threaten certain nuclear destruction in response. If looked at in that way, nuclear deterrence is the only defense against nuclear attack and must, on that basis be regarded as rational. If the fear of nuclear war also prevented conventional war, perhaps the rationality of nuclear deterrence is even more marked.

Does it work? It is impossible to say. Those who argue that the fear of escalation to nuclear exchange also had the effect of deterring conventional military aggression can be accused of forgetting the suicidal nature of the nuclear deterrent. It is by no means certain that a Soviet conventional assault on West Germany, for example, would have led to a U.S. nuclear attack on the Soviet Union. At the heart of NATO strategy was the notion of extended deterrence, by which the nuclear members of the alliance would retaliate with nuclear weapons in the event of a Soviet attack (and not necessarily a nuclear attack) on the nonnuclear members. This was and is, given MAD, tantamount to threatening to commit suicide if someone harms one's friend. Is this credible? Is this rational? As stated above, rationality is in the eye of the beholder.

Nuclear deterrence, by virtue of the profound destructive consequences of its failure, is in a class of its own. Its existence has resulted in nonnuclear deterrent threats being described as conventional deterrence. While nuclear deterrence cannot be regarded entirely separately from other military forms of deterrence, the nuclear threshold represents a distinct psychological barrier. It is to be hoped that the barrier remains in place, particularly in the event of further nuclear proliferation.

STEVEN HAINES


BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aron, Raymond, 1966. Peace and War. A Theory of International Relations. London: Wiedenfeld and Nicolson.

Baylis, J. et al., 1987. Contemporary Strategy Vol I: Theories and Concepts. 2d ed. London: Croom Helm.

Beaufre, Andre, 1965. Deterrence and Strategy. London: Faber and Faber.

Dougherty J. E. and R. L. Pfaltzgraff, 1981. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. 2d ed., Cambridge, MA: Harper and Row.

Freedman, Lawrence, 1987. The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. London: Macmillan.

Mearsheimer, J. J., 1983. Conventional Deterrence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Paton, Sir G. W., 1967. A Textbook of Jurisprudence. 3d ed., ed. by D. P. Derham. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Schelling, Thomas, 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.

Smith J. C. and B. Hogan, 1988. Criminal Law. 6th ed. London: Butterworths.

Wortley, B. A., 1967. Jurisprudence. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

DEVELOPMENT. The all-inclusive process of institutional or organizational fund-raising.

For many years fund-raising activities in nonprofits were seen as a separate and distinct activity. While it was generally believed that public relations had a positive affect on fund-raising results, the usual structure kept the interaction between the functions to a minimum.

In the past two decades, however, a holistic view of "resource development" has taken hold and promoted a more inclusive perspective that includes most activities of the nonprofit as having something to do with fund-raising results. That broader function is now known as "development."

The term "development" is used to describe the entire process of resource acquisition for organizations and institutions. The development office, while primarily responsible for active solicitation of gifts, may also direct the ancillary processes that are conducive to success in fund-raising. This is especially true in higher education.

The following activities have an impact upon fundraising and are often under the direction of the chief development executive:

Public relations. This field may also be found under titles such as community relations, public affairs, or external relations. The work of this unit may entail directing communications and interactions between the organization and its external stakeholders.

Publications. The production of publications in an organization may reside solely in the development office, be under the direction of the public relations office, or be from a communications or publications department. It is generally understood by nonprofits that all communications representing policies, practices, and general information about activities and the current status of the organization can have positive and negative effects on fund-raising results.

Constituent relations. The relationship with ancillary support groups is generally under the direction of development departments, but they may function quite independently, even to the extent of having their own exempt status. It is not unusual to see an alumni office operating as a standalone entity within higher education institutions, or a hospital auxiliary keeping separate accounts and staff assignments.

Grants administration. Many larger nonprofits have offices responsible for the identification of grant opportunities, the processing of grant applications (proactively or in response to requests for proposals), the follow-up to the proposals, and the management and reporting of grants once acquired. These offices usually concentrate on governmental sources, although they may pursue other avenues, such as corporate and foundation funders. Staff is knowledgeable about research and innovative program activities of other staff and faculty and the wide range of sources that can match such endeavors.

-669-

Notes for this page

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this book

This book has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this book

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this page

Cited page

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited page

Bookmark this page
International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration - Vol. 2
Table of contents

Table of contents

Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this book

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen
/ 1240

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.